|
|
|
|
|
|
Advocate Diraj mirajkar Complaints - did not appear in the court at the time of hearing |
|
Advocate Diraj mirajkar |
| Posted: 09 of Apr, 2011 by cpa_0101@redifmail.com |
Send Mail |
|
did not appear in the court at the time of hearing
I WAS POSTED AS ASST.LABOUR COMMISSIONER (CENTRAL) AT GOA IN 2002.ITRIED TO ENFORCE LABOUR LAWS HONESTLY WHICH WAS NOT LIKED BY EMPLOYERS ,CONTRACTORS AND MY OFFICE STAFF INCLUDIN SUPERIORS. HOEVER, INSPITE OF ALL THESE HEARDELS ON 29-5-2003 , I INSPECTED ONE CONTRACTOR ALON WITH OTHER CONTRACTOR IN THE ONGC AND SOM VIOLATIONS WERE RECORDED. BASED ON MY OBSERVATION A LEGAL ACTION WAS REQUIRED TO BE INITIATED AGAINST THE CONTRACTORS. ONE OF THE CONTRACTORS FILED FALS COMPLAINT AGAINST ME IN THE CBI AND IN NIGHT ABOUT 10.30 CBI FRAMED ME IN THE FALS CASE OF BRIBE. I ENGAGED LAWER FROM GOA WHO WAS INFLUENCED BY LOCAL EMPLOYERS HENCE I CHANGED LAWER AND ENGAGED ADVT.DHIRAJ MIRAJKAR AND ADVT.SILPA JOSHI TO ASSIST HIM.HE ARGUED MY CASE IN THE TRIAL COURT AND THE TRIAL JUDGE APPECIATED EVIDENCES IN MY FAVOUR BUT SUDDENLLY SHE TRANSFERED AND JUDGEMENT WAS NOT PASSED. MY ADVOCATE TRANSFERED MY CASE TO THE SAME JUDGE BUT IN THE MEAN TIME SHE CHANGED HER MINDSET AND CONVICTED ME. ADVT.MIRAJKAR FILED APPEAL IN THE HIGHCOURT OF GOA.I REQUESTED HIM THAT THE HIGH COURT JUDGE WHO HEARED MY APPEAL HAS DELT MY MATTER AS TRIAL JUDGE AND ALSO IN THE HIGHCOURT, HENCE MY MATTER MAY NOT BE PLACED BEFORE HIM AS HE IS BIASED.HOWEVER , HE WAS READY TO LITION ME. HE ARGUED MY CASE BEFORE THE SAME JUDGE MORE THAN 80% AND THEREAFTER HE EXPRESSED THAT JUDGE IS NOT GIVING SERIOUS HEARING AND THAN HE SENT A MESSAGE TO ME THAT HIS WIFE IS HAVING CANCER AND HE CAN NOT ATTEND THE COURT HENCE I REQUESTED A LOCAL LAYER TO ASK FOR ADJORNMENT. THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED THREE FOUR TIME FOR MORE THAN A MONTH . ULTIMAELY HE APPEARED BEFORE THE COURT ON 23,NOVEMBER,2010. I OBSERVED THAT HE WAS NOT SHOWING MUCH INTEREST IN THE ARGUMENTS , EVEN HE DID NOT QUOTE RELEVENT JUDGEMENTS WHICH WER QUOTED IN THE TRIAL COURT. ON 24TH NOVEMBER,2010 THE MATTER WAS PLACED FOR ARGUMENT OF THE PROSECUTION ADVOCATE. MY ADVOCATE WAS NOT PRESENT IN THE COURT THROUGHOUT THE DAY OF ARGUMENT .IN LAST SOME CLERIFICATION WERE ASKED BY THE JUDGE BUT MY ADVOCATE MR. MIRAJKAR WAS NOT PRESENT AND MATTER DESIDED WITHOUT ANY CLERIFICATION. I LOST THE GOOD CASE. NOW I HAVE FILED SLP IN THE SUPREME COURT.IPUT UNDER SUSPENSION. |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Do you want to Login before Post your Comment? |
|
|
You can also post Comments directly by skipping Login...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
